How to create links between applications/practioners and research
What difficulties do practitioners encounter when trying to find scientific evidence?
Why is it so hard for meeting practitioners to spot the form and process of meetings? (They all focus on content, understandably; but the mastery of meeting process is what makes the better meeting)
I don’t understand this one. Can this be restated with more specific context? certainly there are many arenas where the practitioners are deeply aware of process
How to take small meeting practice into big conference sessions?
How do we make our meeting science/evidence based knowledge more relevant and accessible to practitioners and the organizations they serve?
What empirical questions would practitioners or meeting facilitators would like to see answered most?